Hi Chris,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:02:03PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> > The patch doesn't seem quite right, so I don't think we should apply it
> > as-is. It seems to me LIBINPUT_QUIRKS_SRCDIR shouldn't be in the
> > shipped packages at all, so a patch that fixes that and can
Hi Julien,
> The patch doesn't seem quite right, so I don't think we should apply it
> as-is. It seems to me LIBINPUT_QUIRKS_SRCDIR shouldn't be in the
> shipped packages at all, so a patch that fixes that and can be sent
> upstream would be better.
I would agree. I blame "2018 lamby" for his
Control: tag -1 - patch
Control: tag -1 + upstream
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 07:03:38AM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> > Source: libinput
> > Version: 1.12.6-2+deb10u1
> > Tags: patch
>
> There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 703 days, in which
> time the Reproducible
Dear Maintainer,
> Source: libinput
> Version: 1.12.6-2+deb10u1
> Tags: patch
There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 703 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way.
Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Source: libinput
Version: 1.12.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: buildpath
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that libinput could not be built
5 matches
Mail list logo
