Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-12-05 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 06:42:33AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > tags -1 patch > user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > usertags -1 + bsp-2018-12-ch-bern > thanks > > So here we go ... > > The files resulting from the conversion to cmake are not as terse as I > hoped they would be. Still, at le

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-12-05 Thread Christoph Biedl
tags -1 patch user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org usertags -1 + bsp-2018-12-ch-bern thanks So here we go ... The files resulting from the conversion to cmake are not as terse as I hoped they would be. Still, at least for me, this is an improvement over to several handcrafted rules, especially fo

Bug#911154: Bug#912120: Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-11-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Adrian Bunk wrote... > Any update on that? As I wrote in the previous message, allow me until end of November to create the fixes. This still is my plan. Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#911154: Bug#912120: Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-11-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:01:21AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: >... > Switching to e.g. cmake means a one-time more-or-less complex manual > transition but afterwards the packaging should be in a sane state for > quite some time. > > After thinking about this for a few days I agree this is the s

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-11-05 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:01:21AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > [ > Cc'ing *all* affected packages. Noisy, but all parties involved > should be aware of the progress. > ] > > Helmut Grohne wrote... > > > I'm not sure that adding our own confgen is maintainable in the long > > run. We a

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-11-04 Thread Christoph Biedl
[ Cc'ing *all* affected packages. Noisy, but all parties involved should be aware of the progress. ] Helmut Grohne wrote... > I'm not sure that adding our own confgen is maintainable in the long > run. We already have very many build systems in Debian. We've learned > the hard way that su

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-10-28 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 Control: reassign -2 src:biff Control: retitle -2 biff misses the generator for configure Control: reassign -3 src:bsd-finger Control: retitle -3 bsd-finger misses the generator for configure Control: reassign -4 src:linux-ftpd Contr

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-10-28 Thread Christoph Biedl
Helmut Grohne wrote... > The configure file in the netkit-ntalk is generated using confgen from > MCONFIG.in. However, the generator is missing. No package in unstable > contains said confgen tool. Thus configure cannot be regenerated after > fixing a bug. That's a violation of DFSG #2. [ The app

Bug#911154: netkit-ntalk misses the generator for configure

2018-10-16 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: netkit-ntalk Version: 0.17-15 Severity: serious Justification: DFSG #2 User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap The configure file in the netkit-ntalk is generated using confgen from MCONFIG.in. However, the generator is missing. No package in unstable contains said confgen tool. Thu