Hi Rhonda,
> ~\b(grep\b.*/etc/(?:passwd|group))\b
>
> I'm not completely sure about the syntax here, but the \b before the
> bracket looks like it wouldn't catch egrep
Oh, good catch. Fixed in:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/38b74fe0a101aa10d4ea87084fa05bc420986321
I
* Chris Lamb [2018-10-16 17:05:17 CEST]:
> Dear Rhonda,
>
> Thank you for filing this.
Sure, no worries. :)
> > https://sources.debian.org/src/proftpd-dfsg/1.3.5d-1/debian/proftpd-basic.postinst/?hl=28#L28
> > is an example from our pool, but there are more.
>
> This example:
>
>
tags 911157 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/8cbfd096b018e384f905b198543aa90c107e22c6
checks/scripts.desc | 11 +++
data/scripts/maintainer-script-bad-command| 1 +
Dear Rhonda,
Thank you for filing this.
> https://sources.debian.org/src/proftpd-dfsg/1.3.5d-1/debian/proftpd-basic.postinst/?hl=28#L28
> is an example from our pool, but there are more.
This example:
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/debianpkg/frr.postinst#L4-L9
… is also
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I was prodded by Lamby to file this bugreport. :) I noticed in a
package (not yet in Debian) that it uses grep on the passwd/group file
directly instead of using getent. This hinders detecting users stored
in a different database.
Given
5 matches
Mail list logo
