Control: user pkg-apparmor-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 +modify-profile
Also Rene, please add usertag for any AppArmor-related bug, so AppArmor team
could see what's going on.
Hi,
I too seen these /tmp/xauth.. stuff (I'm KDE user), and asked about it in AppArmor mailing list [0],
and later in debian-devel [1].
Nothing new since when, haven given it any more time, but what I would like to achieve is as
"agreement", that if some Debian package changes some "popular"
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:24:52PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Which one you get depends on the exact way the app is launched. In the
> screenshot, the xterm on the left was launched as part of session restore;
> the one on the right was launched from the KDE menu (bottom-left thingy).
clone 911897 -1
retitle 911897 apparmor denies /tmp/xauth-1000-_0 set by sddm/KDE
retitle -1 please include nvidia apparmor abstraction to allow nvidia
driver resources
severity -1 wishlist
tag -1 - unreproducible
tag -1 - moreinfo
tag -1 + wontfix
thanks
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:13:00PM -0400,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:13:00PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On 10/26/18 11:26 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Then there is a lot of nVidia stuff, probably from this machine using the
> > > nVidia proprietary
> > > driver.
> > Then the nvidia drivers (which I do not care about at all, to
On 10/26/18 11:26 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Then there is a lot of nVidia stuff, probably from this machine using the
nVidia proprietary
driver.
Then the nvidia drivers (which I do not care about at all, to be honest)
or libdrm or whatever should ship needed stuff. I mean, it's not LO using
the
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Then there is a lot of nVidia stuff, probably from this machine using the
> > nVidia proprietary
> > driver.
>
> Then the nvidia drivers (which I do not care about at all, to be honest)
> or libdrm or whatever should ship ne
tag 911897 + moreinfo
tag 911897 + unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Presumably the xauth one will effect a lot of people (as that's the
> value of $XAUTHORITY here, set by KDE/sddm). Then there is a lot of
Really?
$ echo $XAUTHORITY
/hom
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> I understand the goal is to get AppArmor back in to enforcing mode
> someday, so presumably these complain-mode allow messages are of use.
> Presumably the xauth one will effect a lot of people (as that's the
> value of $XAU
Package: libreoffice-core
Version: 1:6.1.3~rc1-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/oosplash
I understand the goal is to get AppArmor back in to enforcing mode
someday, so presumably these complain-mode allow messages are of use.
Presumably the xauth one will effect a lot of peopl
10 matches
Mail list logo
