On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Fri 16 Nov 2018 at 12:22PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > How about also adding one that makes it clear that in *Debian*, policy
> > follows practice, and not the other way around (which should also
> > require seconds just to make sure p
Hello,
On Fri 16 Nov 2018 at 12:22PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> How about also adding one that makes it clear that in *Debian*, policy
> follows practice, and not the other way around (which should also
> require seconds just to make sure people agree with this, even if it is
> a
On Fri, 2018-11-16 at 12:22:35 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> How about also adding one that makes it clear that in *Debian*, policy
> follows practice, and not the other way around (which should also
> require seconds just to make sure people agree with this, even if it is
> a decades
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.2.1.4
>
> The discussion in #913572 is just another instance of the following
> antipattern:
>
>Submitter: program X does strange thing Y which is undesirable
>Maintainer: Y is not against policy
>
> I sugge
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:11:02 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Tue 13 Nov 2018 at 05:51PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I suggest adding something like this to s1.1, "Scope", as a new 3rd
> > paragraph:
> >
> > This manual cannot and does not prohibit every possible bug or
> > undesirable behaviou
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:51:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I suggest adding something like this to s1.1, "Scope", as a new 3rd
> paragraph:
>
> This manual cannot and does not prohibit every possible bug or
> undesirable behaviour. The fact that something is not forbidden by
> Debian po
Hello Ian,
On Tue 13 Nov 2018 at 05:51PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The discussion in #913572 is just another instance of the following
> antipattern:
>
>Submitter: program X does strange thing Y which is undesirable
>Maintainer: Y is not against policy
>
> I suggest adding something li
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.2.1.4
The discussion in #913572 is just another instance of the following
antipattern:
Submitter: program X does strange thing Y which is undesirable
Maintainer: Y is not against policy
I suggest adding something like this to s1.1, "Scope", as a new 3rd
8 matches
Mail list logo