Bug#915583: about html_static_path

control: tag -1 + pending Hello, On Sat 24 Feb 2024 at 08:52am +01, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Sean Whitton wrote (Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:58:59 > +0800): >> Attached is the patch I prepared, which I couldn't get to work. Maybe >> you can see what is wrong. Thanks! > > As I know it,

Bug#915583: about html_static_path

Hi Sean, Sean Whitton wrote (Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:58:59 +0800): > Attached is the patch I prepared, which I couldn't get to work. Maybe > you can see what is wrong. Thanks! As I know it, the debian.css file has to reside in policy/_static. And activate (un-comment) the path declaration for

Bug#915583: about html_static_path

Hello, On Thu 15 Feb 2024 at 11:44pm +01, Holger Wansing wrote: > Sean Whitton wrote: >> On Fri 29 Dec 2023 at 07:08am +01, Stéphane Blondon wrote: >> >> > Yes, html_static_path must be set but it's already the case in conf.py.in: >> >

Bug#915583: about html_static_path

Sean Whitton wrote: > On Fri 29 Dec 2023 at 07:08am +01, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > > > Yes, html_static_path must be set but it's already the case in conf.py.in: > > https://sources.debian.org/src/debian-policy/4.6.2.0/policy/conf.py.in/#L105 > > > > I guess conf.py is generated from

Bug#915583: about html_static_path

Hello, On Fri 29 Dec 2023 at 07:08am +01, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > Yes, html_static_path must be set but it's already the case in conf.py.in: > https://sources.debian.org/src/debian-policy/4.6.2.0/policy/conf.py.in/#L105 > > I guess conf.py is generated from conf.py.in so we only need to keep >

Bug#915583: about html_static_path

Yes, html_static_path must be set but it's already the case in conf.py.in: https://sources.debian.org/src/debian-policy/4.6.2.0/policy/conf.py.in/#L105 I guess conf.py is generated from conf.py.in so we only need to keep the current setup. -- Stéphane