tags 916468 + patch
tags 916468 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for whitedune (versioned as 0.30.10-2.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay
it longer. I have based my NMU on top of what is currently in the salsa
archive, so it includes a b
Hi
On 21-01-2019 21:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Pending the discussion in bug 919951 [1] I canceled my NMU. Depending on
> the outcome and if nothing has happened in this bug by the whitedune
> maintainers, I'll re-upload with the fix for the man-page included.
The TC discussion in bug 919951 isn't
My package in DELAYED is missing a solution for the man page. I'll fix that.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 dune 1.6.2-1
Control: retitle -2 dune: needs Breaks+Replaces: whitedune (<< 0.30.10-2.2)
Control: tags -2 =
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:16:00 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for whitedune (versioned as 0.30.10-2.2) and
If whitedune is going to
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
Pending the discussion in bug 919951 [1] I canceled my NMU. Depending on
the outcome and if nothing has happened in this bug by the whitedune
maintainers, I'll re-upload with the fix for the man-page included.
Paul
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/919951
signature.asc
5 matches
Mail list logo