Bug#917031: nmh: co-installability with mmh

2018-12-27 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 14:58:21 +, Dmitry Bogatov writes: >For cases of developing/testing something, that should work with both MH >implementation. i'm sorry, but i don't consider this sufficient justification for a mix-n-match installation: if i want to test something's ability to work with th

Bug#917031: nmh: co-installability with mmh

2018-12-23 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-12-22 12:59] Alexander Zangerl > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:54:41 +, Dmitry Bogatov writes: > >please make `nmh' co-installable with `mmh'. > > upon reviewing of mmh's documentation and stated goals i don't think > this will work. i think that mmh has to conflict with nmh. > > it's not c

Bug#917031: nmh: co-installability with mmh

2018-12-21 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:54:41 +, Dmitry Bogatov writes: >please make `nmh' co-installable with `mmh'. upon reviewing of mmh's documentation and stated goals i don't think this will work. i think that mmh has to conflict with nmh. it's not compatible with nmh (except in terms of mail storage on

Bug#917031: nmh: co-installability with mmh

2018-12-21 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:54:41 +, Dmitry Bogatov writes: >please make `nmh' co-installable with `mmh'. I, as maintainer of `mmh', >took first step and made `mmh' alternative of /usr/bin/mh/mh and bunch >of slave links. sure, i'll have a look at making those changes in the next few days. regards

Bug#917031: nmh: co-installability with mmh

2018-12-21 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: nmh Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, please make `nmh' co-installable with `mmh'. I, as maintainer of `mmh', took first step and made `mmh' alternative of /usr/bin/mh/mh and bunch of slave links. pgpGj7WI4lTcu.pgp Description: PGP signature