On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 22:24:21 +1100 Dean Hamstead
wrote:
The same results are given when tested against:
pdns-server (3.4.1-4+deb8u8)
pdns-server (4.0.3-1~bpo8+1)
pdns-server (4.0.3-1+deb9u2)
To get a clean slate on 4.0, you need to disable the packet cache.
However, as Christian noted, the
* Dean Hamstead [190108 13:02]:
> The same results are given when tested against:
>
> pdns-server (3.4.1-4+deb8u8)
> pdns-server (4.0.3-1~bpo8+1)
> pdns-server (4.0.3-1+deb9u2)
Just for the record, your ednscomp links do not work - I think they
expire after a short time. I'll have to see for mys
The same results are given when tested against:
pdns-server (3.4.1-4+deb8u8)
pdns-server (4.0.3-1~bpo8+1)
pdns-server (4.0.3-1+deb9u2)
On 8/1/19 8:52 pm, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Dean Hamstead [190108 05:03]:
Version: 3.4.1-4+deb8u8
It seems that 'certain work arounds' are being remov
* Dean Hamstead [190108 05:03]:
> Version: 3.4.1-4+deb8u8
>
> It seems that 'certain work arounds' are being removed on the 1st of Feb 2019
> according to https://dnsflagday.net/
>
> I have generated this report https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/154f9de8ce
> (nothing secret about it), but am n
Package: pdns-server
Version: 3.4.1-4+deb8u8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that 'certain work arounds' are being removed on the 1st of Feb 2019
according to https://dnsflagday.net/
I have generated this report https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/154f9de8ce
(nothing secret about it),
5 matches
Mail list logo