On 2020-04-21 21:39:43 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2020-04-15 13:38:23 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think setting defaults in
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 09:18:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-04-15 13:38:23 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > >
> > > I think setting defaults in the shared library itself would be more
> > > robust, and if
On 2020-04-15 13:38:23 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >
> > I think setting defaults in the shared library itself would be more
> > robust, and if a configuration file to override that is necessary,
>
> This is also the route that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:19:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> I think setting defaults in the shared library itself would be more
> robust, and if a configuration file to override that is necessary,
This is also the route that Ubuntu took, because it's possible to
install the library
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 23:44:54 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-01-08 20:17:42 [+], Simon McVittie wrote:
> > It should probably at least have a Breaks on libssl1.0.2, to protect
> > partial upgrades from stretch. Some release notes for users of
> > third-party software might
On 2019-01-08 20:17:42 [+], Simon McVittie wrote:
> It should probably at least have a Breaks on libssl1.0.2, to protect
> partial upgrades from stretch. Some release notes for users of
> third-party software might also be useful. I realise it probably isn't
> feasible to keep openssl.cnf
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:17:42PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 1.1.1a-1
> Severity: important
> Control: found -1 1.1.1~~pre3-1
> Control: affects -1 steam
>
> The openssl.cnf in the openssl package since 1.1.1~~pre3-1 is incompatible
> with libssl < 1.1.0 (I think
Package: openssl
Version: 1.1.1a-1
Severity: important
Control: found -1 1.1.1~~pre3-1
Control: affects -1 steam
The openssl.cnf in the openssl package since 1.1.1~~pre3-1 is incompatible
with libssl < 1.1.0 (I think that's the right cutoff point), either from
a partial upgrade or bundled with
8 matches
Mail list logo
