Bug#920147: [Debian-science-sagemath] Bug#920147: sagemath FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el

2019-12-22 Thread peter green
On 23/12/2019 04:15, Ximin Luo wrote: I've set the severity of this bug to important, because it should not block migration. If this were a regression then it would be RC, but since sagemath is already not in testing, it is not a regression. There is no reason or policy to block migration bec

Bug#920147: [Debian-science-sagemath] Bug#920147: sagemath FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el

2019-12-22 Thread Ximin Luo
I've set the severity of this bug to important, because it should not block migration. If this were a regression then it would be RC, but since sagemath is already not in testing, it is not a regression. There is no reason or policy to block migration because it *remains* missing on some releas

Bug#920147: sagemath FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el

2019-11-13 Thread Tobias Hansen
It seems like the build failures are related to timeouts of jmol. These timeouts started roughly at the time when the default Java version was changed in java-common from 10 to 11 in October 2018. There are also other reports of jmol being broken depending on the jre version, see https://ask.sa

Bug#920147: sagemath FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el

2019-01-22 Thread Tobias Hansen
On 1/22/19 8:59 AM, peter green wrote: > sagemath versions from 8.4-2 through to 8.6-2 have failed to build on mipsel > and mips64el. snip > This will need to be dealt with one way or the other (either by fixing the > build failures or by requesting removal of the old binaries) before sagemath >

Bug#920147: sagemath FTBFS on mipsel and mips64el

2019-01-22 Thread peter green
Package: sagemath Version: 8.4-2 Severity: serious sagemath versions from 8.4-2 through to 8.6-2 have failed to build on mipsel and mips64el. mipsel is failing with Success: 42 tests failed, up to 90 failures are tolerated Error: critical test failures (e.g. timeout, segfault, etc.) make[2]: