On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:25:49PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
> I'll note that Debian also packages "livingston-radius", which hasn't had
> any source changes in 20 years. There's no mailing list, no support, and it
> doesn't implement any of the modern RADIUS standards.
>
> Including that
The freeradius package is generally in good shape these days, I think.
There are a few users who will report bugs, and there is at least one who
is interested in having the latest upstream version available.
The work required to maintain the package is moderate — let’s say a few
hours each
Alan DeKok:
> We've been looking for a new Debian maintainer for a while.
>
> What, exactly, is in "bad shape" about this package? If there are issues,
> we can work towards fixing them.
>
> The software is widely used by many tens of thousands of sites. I hope
> it's not going to be
We've been looking for a new Debian maintainer for a while.
What, exactly, is in "bad shape" about this package? If there are issues, we
can work towards fixing them.
The software is widely used by many tens of thousands of sites. I hope it's
not going to be removed from Debian.
4 matches
Mail list logo
