Hi Nicholas,
> Maybe it's obvious, but perhaps the developer's reference and
> wiki/PackageSalvaging would benefit from the addition of "Things to do
> before NMUing…for a team maintained package, […] It's a
> trivial bit of work I'd be happy to do...
Go for it :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:16:29PM -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> > Well, I packaged memleax because I couldn't find heaptrack, and when
> > memleax was abandoned upstream I discovered heaptrack via memleax'
> > issue tracker.
>
> I certainly would agree that this is a bug. That is
Hi Nicholas,
> Well, I packaged memleax because I couldn't find heaptrack, and when
> memleax was abandoned upstream I discovered heaptrack via memleax'
> issue tracker.
I certainly would agree that this is a bug. That is not the question here.
> So are NMUs only justified for fixing RC bugs
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:29:56AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> > heaptrack (1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >
> > * Non-maintainer upload.
> > * Update description to make heaptrack more discoverable to users.
> > (Closes: #915241)
> >
Hi Nicholas,
> heaptrack (1.1.0+20180922.gitf752536-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Update description to make heaptrack more discoverable to users.
> (Closes: #915241)
>
> -- Nicholas D Steeves Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:44:03 -0700
Whilst I agree about the p
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of "heaptrack", to fix its poor
discoverability.
It builds these binary packages:
heaptrack - heap memory profiler for Linux
heaptrack-gui - heap memory profiler for Linux
libheaptrack - he
6 matches
Mail list logo
