Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2020-12-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: alpine Version: 2.24+dfsg1-1 Followup-For: Bug #923481 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de This bug still persists. This caused loss of connection between a mailing list thread and a debbugs entry. This is becoming really annoying. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-08-30 Thread Unit 193
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Control: severity -1 important Howdy, On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Unit 193 wrote: Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it seems it preserved those fields as expected. I

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-08-19 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Unit 193 wrote: > Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it > seems it preserved those fields as expected. I am using alpine 2.21. Please try this, from the original submission: If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-08-13 Thread Unit 193
Howdy, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote: severity 923481 serious thanks (Please remember to Cc the bug submitter when replying.) On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Unit 193 wrote: As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a difference in how pine and alpine function, correct?

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-08-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
severity 923481 serious thanks (Please remember to Cc the bug submitter when replying.) On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Unit 193 wrote: > As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a > difference in how pine and alpine function, correct? No, this is definitively a serious loss of

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-03-09 Thread Unit 193
Howdy, As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a difference in how pine and alpine function, correct? ~Unit 193 Unit193 @ freenode Unit193 @ OFTC

Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers

2019-02-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: alpine Version: 2.21+dfsg1-1.1 Severity: serious If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject line, press ^K to remove the existing (possibly damaged) text and type new text (possibly to change the subthread subject), the eMail gets sent out AND Fcc’d without both In-Reply-To