Am 09.03.19 um 22:43 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 09.03.19 um 22:27 schrieb Santiago Vila:
>> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:59:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Am 09.03.19 um 21:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> to which I also add these two lines:
Am 09.03.19 um 22:27 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:59:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 09.03.19 um 21:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>> Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
to which I also add these two lines:
>>> ..> /dev/urandom/dev/random none
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:59:16PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 09.03.19 um 21:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> >> to which I also add these two lines:
> > ..> /dev/urandom/dev/random nonerw,bind 0 0
> >
> > This might very
Am 09.03.19 um 21:50 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
>> to which I also add these two lines:
> ..> /dev/urandom/dev/random nonerw,bind 0 0
>
> This might very well be the culprit, given that test-stat-util does the
> following check:
Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> to which I also add these two lines:
..> /dev/urandom/dev/random nonerw,bind 0 0
This might very well be the culprit, given that test-stat-util does the
following check:
Am 09.03.19 um 21:00 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> For the second part, I'm not familiar with the package, so I'm not
> sure I will be able to get a backtrace of the failing test easily,
> that's why I offer ssh access to a test machine.
It's rather simple, really.
Run apt-get source -b systemd
> >>> I checked a couple and they both fail on test-stat-util. Any chance
> >>> you could get a backtrace of the failing test?
> >>>
> >>> My guess is that sbuild setups something in /dev in a way that
> >>> test-stat-util is not liking. What is your sbuild setup? It's not
> >>> failing for me
Am 09.03.19 um 20:40 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:32:10PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:55:33 -0300 Felipe Sateler
>> wrote:
>>> I checked a couple and they both fail on test-stat-util. Any chance
>>>
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 08:32:10PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:55:33 -0300 Felipe Sateler
> wrote:
> > I checked a couple and they both fail on test-stat-util. Any chance
> > you could get a backtrace of the failing test?
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:55:33 -0300 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> I checked a couple and they both fail on test-stat-util. Any chance
> you could get a backtrace of the failing test?
>
> My guess is that sbuild setups something in /dev in a way that
>
Control: severity -1 important.
Resetting severity because this is not a problem in buildds, nor on my
own laptop.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 1:21 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Package: src:systemd
> Version: 240-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this
Package: src:systemd
Version: 240-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in sid but it failed:
[...]
debian/rules binary-arch
dh binary-arch --without autoreconf,systemd
12 matches
Mail list logo
