On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:42 PM John Scott wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:40:14 -0400 FeRD wrote:
> > If Debian maintains JUCE as a distro package, and it would be a
> compatible
> > alternative to our JUCE-based "libopenshot-audio", I don't see any
> reason we
> > can't add an option to
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 21:40:14 -0400 FeRD wrote:
> If Debian maintains JUCE as a distro package, and it would be a compatible
> alternative to our JUCE-based "libopenshot-audio", I don't see any reason we
> can't add an option to libopenshot's CMake configuration that tells it to
> just
> use those
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:41 PM John Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 23:33:59 -0400 FeRD wrote:
> > What version of libopenshot is that result from? The Clang namespacing
> was
> > fixed with the merge of 2a1fe80[1] on 2019-10-29, and would be included
> in
> > both libopenshot-0.2.4 and
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 23:33:59 -0400 FeRD wrote:
> Sorry, I realized I might have sent this reply to the wrong bug.
Yes, I sent my mail to both of the bugs (am doing now again, I guess). I am
also making noise :)
> What version of libopenshot is that result from? The Clang namespacing was
> fixed
Sorry, I realized I might have sent this reply to the wrong bug.
-- Forwarded message -
From: FeRD
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fixed in newer release of libopenshot / libopenshot-audio
To: <925...@bugs.debian.org>
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:04:59 -0400 John
5 matches
Mail list logo
