Bug#926042: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#926042: Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-07-29 Thread intrigeri
Antoine Beaupré: > intrigeri: how does Tails ship TBB nowadays? The above bug report says > something about an Iceweasel package 6 years ago, but surely that can't > be up to date anymore... ;) Earlier in May you mentioned a "weird way" > without going into details... See the "3.6.13 Tor Browser"

Bug#926042: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#926042: Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-07-29 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-07-27 12:12:25, intrigeri wrote: > Roger Shimizu: >> Buster is released, so I guess it's okay to reduce the severity to let >> it migrate to testing again. > > Thanks a lot for caring about torbrowser-launcher! > > FTR, I'm not enthusiastic at the idea of seeing it in testing and > backport

Bug#926042: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-07-27 Thread intrigeri
Roger Shimizu: > Buster is released, so I guess it's okay to reduce the severity to let > it migrate to testing again. Thanks a lot for caring about torbrowser-launcher! FTR, I'm not enthusiastic at the idea of seeing it in testing and backports (I suspect the reasons why torbrowser-launcher was

Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-07-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
severity: -1 normal Buster is released, so I guess it's okay to reduce the severity to let it migrate to testing again. I'll try to backports to stable and sloppy later. Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT -3 Curitiba PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Bug#926042: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-05-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Antoine Beaupré: > On 2019-05-03 17:15:59, intrigeri wrote: >>> 1. maintain through backports (seems to have been the option taken for >>> stretch) >> >> That might be viable if the AppArmor profiles are disabled by default. > Why would we disable apparmor profiles? See the "2." part of

Bug#926042: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-05-03 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2019-05-03 17:15:59, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (slightly reordering quoted text) > > Antoine Beaupre: >> So what will be the way forward for Debian users in buster? > >> TL;DR: TBL in backports or install by hand from TPO, AFAIK. > > Agreed. > >> What does Tails do with this? > > Tails only use

Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-05-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (slightly reordering quoted text) Antoine Beaupre: > So what will be the way forward for Debian users in buster? > TL;DR: TBL in backports or install by hand from TPO, AFAIK. Agreed. > What does Tails do with this? Tails only uses the torbrowser-launcher source package as a way to get its

Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-05-03 Thread Antoine Beaupre
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 07:14:38PM +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > Source: torbrowser-launcher > Version: 0.3.1-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > for basically the same reasons that made us not include > torbrowser-launcher in Stretch, IMO it should not be part of Buster > either: [...all v

Bug#926042: torbrowser-launcher should not be included in Buster

2019-03-30 Thread intrigeri
Source: torbrowser-launcher Version: 0.3.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, for basically the same reasons that made us not include torbrowser-launcher in Stretch, IMO it should not be part of Buster either: 1. This downloader package requires updates, from time to time, to cope with changes in how To