Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-04-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Scott, > >… I strongly suspect this is the case, yeah. If you agree, please > >go ahead and -done this issue. Thanks either way, naturally. :) > > These are all EICAR test files [1]. Generically these are all test > files (I haven't checked, other packages may ship these to). It would >

Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-04-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 1, 2019 10:30:58 AM UTC, Chris Lamb wrote: >Hi Scott, > >> > > I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need >hardening >> > > features, so [1] seems pretty pointless. >> > >> > I don't disagree at all here but I'm wondering how Lintian would be >> > able to detect that

Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-04-01 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Scott, > > > I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need hardening > > > features, so [1] seems pretty pointless. > > > > I don't disagree at all here but I'm wondering how Lintian would be > > able to detect that these are test files? Perhaps I'm missing > > something. :) > >

Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-04-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, April 01, 2019 04:45:44 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 926060 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Scott, > > > I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need hardening > > features, so [1] seems pretty pointless. > > I don't disagree at all here but I'm wondering how Lintian would be

Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-04-01 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 926060 + moreinfo thanks Hi Scott, > I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need hardening features, > so [1] seems pretty pointless. I don't disagree at all here but I'm wondering how Lintian would be able to detect that these are test files? Perhaps I'm missing something.

Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

2019-03-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: lintian Version: 2.11.0 Severity: normal I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need hardening features, so [1] seems pretty pointless. Scott K [1] https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html#clamav clamav-testfiles E