Bug#928014: nmu: wine-development_4.2-4

2019-05-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jens, On 09-05-2019 22:54, Jens Reyer wrote: [...] > The files built with unicode-data are in arch-specific packages, so a > binnmu should work. [...] > So what do you think, binnmu or new source upload? Than I have a preference for binNMU (this could be my first binNMU as well). Paul

Bug#928014: nmu: wine-development_4.2-4

2019-05-09 Thread Jens Reyer
Hi Paul, hi wine-team On 09.05.19 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote: > retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2 > reassign 928014 wine-development > usertag 928014 unicode-data-12 > thanks > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry > wrote: >> Package:

Bug#928014: nmu: wine-development_4.2-4

2019-05-09 Thread Paul Gevers
retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2 reassign 928014 wine-development usertag 928014 unicode-data-12 thanks On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >

Bug#928014: nmu: wine-development_4.2-4

2019-04-26 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu wine-development_4.2-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2" -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,