tags 931039 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
I just fixed this in the upstream Git repository:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/strip-nondeterminism/commit/849f8516fc6e3b6da86290d4dd08d3dd2ddbd04c
However, I will now likely wait until the release of "buster" before
uploading to
Hi Chris,
>I can see how it may make tests fail if they were naively comparing
>checksums or similar, but I'm not sure how this could make a package
>not reproducible.
Consider package A, contains PNGs, and package B, embeds the PNGs
from package A into its output (B can be identical to A). Then
Hi Thorsten,
> thanks! I did not want to get too deep into yak shaving in the
> dark hours of the night
Absolutely nothing to apologise for. It's far better the report exists
rather than it falling between the cracks and not being reported, even
if it requires a quick 'n' easy reassign (thanks
Hi Chris,
>I've forwarded this upstream here:
thanks! I did not want to get too deep into yak shaving in the
dark hours of the night as I had something to do with a deadline,
so I’ve only seen that something in dh did it.
>(Just as an aside, how come the tests fail? Are they looking
No, I just
forwarded 931039
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/strip-nondeterminism/issues/7
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/strip-nondeterminism/issues/7
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'`
retitle 931039 dh-strip-nondeterminism: Does not appear to clamp timestamps in
PNG files
thanks
Hi,
> While I’m sure the reproducible builds people appreciate
> limiting the mtime, raising it is not done otherwise.
Yes, it is curious why strip-nondeterminism is not "clamping" the
timestamps
6 matches
Mail list logo
