On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 15:03:28 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In that case, should we increase the strength of this by changing the
> first sentence? I'm not seeing much purpose served by developer
> discretion here, and this clarifies matters for tool developers.
Sure.
> diff --git a/policy/ch-co
Hello,
On Sun 14 Jul 2019 at 03:03PM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In that case, should we increase the strength of this by changing the
> first sentence? I'm not seeing much purpose served by developer
> discretion here, and this clarifies matters for tool developers.
>
> diff --git a/policy/ch-co
Hello,
On Sun 14 Jul 2019 at 11:19AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> index 81b3542..fb2b6e5 100644
> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
> @@ -979,7 +979,8 @@ repository where the Debian source p
Guillem Jover writes:
>> diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
>> index 81b3542..d491d57 100644
>> --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
>> +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst
>> @@ -979,7 +979,10 @@ repository where the Debian source package is developed.
>> or ``
Hi!
On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 09:31:16 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yeah, this just seems generally wrong to me. I assume the idea was that a
> package may have mirrors of its packaging repository in multiple VCS
> systems and list all of them, but I'm dubious there's much point. My
> leaning is to
Sean Whitton writes:
> This is more than the minimal change required to fix this bug. It seems
> like a good idea on a first look, but we should see if we're going to
> make any packages buggy by introducing a 'should' requirement here.
Agreed. The minimal change is probably this:
diff --git
Hello,
On Sun 14 Jul 2019 at 09:31AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes:
>
>>> From Debian policy 4.4.0 paragraph 5.6.26:
>>>
>>> More than one different VCS may be specified for the same package.
>
>> Right, and apparently I seconded that change, with this very confused
>> wording
Guillem Jover writes:
>> From Debian policy 4.4.0 paragraph 5.6.26:
>>
>> More than one different VCS may be specified for the same package.
> Right, and apparently I seconded that change, with this very confused
> wording :/, although my reading is different: as in diffferent VCS
> types are a
Control: reassign -1 debian-policy
Hi!
On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 10:27:24 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: important
> With two Vsc-Git statements in debian/control I get:
>
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 14:
> d
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.19.7
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
With two Vsc-Git statements in debian/control I get:
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 14:
duplicate field Vcs-Git found
- From Debian policy 4.4.0 para
10 matches
Mail list logo
