Bug#932759: [PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit

2020-05-26 Thread Ian Jackson
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit"): > On 5/26/20 12:44 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think it would be wise to look at the generated .debs and see that > > they contain (only) the expected pieces in their maintscripts. > > Yes, I did

Bug#932759: [PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit

2020-05-26 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
Hi, On 5/26/20 12:44 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Hans van Kranenburg writes ("[PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen > dh_installinit"): >> When debugging the xen-utils postinst/prerm to find the cause of the >> mysteriously disappearing xenconsoled processes, I discovered that the >>

Bug#932759: [PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit

2020-05-26 Thread Ian Jackson
Hans van Kranenburg writes ("[PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit"): > When debugging the xen-utils postinst/prerm to find the cause of the > mysteriously disappearing xenconsoled processes, I discovered that the > xen-utils-common postinst and prerm stop and start the xen

Bug#932759: [PATCH 2/2] debian/rules: --no-start for xen dh_installinit

2020-05-25 Thread Hans van Kranenburg
When debugging the xen-utils postinst/prerm to find the cause of the mysteriously disappearing xenconsoled processes, I discovered that the xen-utils-common postinst and prerm stop and start the xen init script as well! These commands are not visible in the packaging code, but they are added by