Hi Ted,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 04:26:34PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> When I say "defer" I mean for less than a week. 3 days so e2fsprogs
> can enter testing, and then usually with the greater exposure, more
> bugs get reported, and then a handul of days for me to fix up problems
> and re-u
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 06:21:57PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:04:48AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > Yes, I had noticed that this was breaking some of the ports build as
> > well, and so I have a similar patch in my tree already. I was going
> > to wa
Hi Ted,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:04:48AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Yes, I had noticed that this was breaking some of the ports build as
> well, and so I have a similar patch in my tree already. I was going
> to wait a few days to see if there were any other issues, and to allow
> 1.45.3-
control: -1 tags +pending
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 08:09:22AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.45.3-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftcbfs
>
> e2fsprogs fails to cross build from source, since the -3 upload, becaus
Source: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.45.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
e2fsprogs fails to cross build from source, since the -3 upload, because
its support for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck is broken. Setting severity to
important, because e2fsprogs is
5 matches
Mail list logo
