Control: reassign 934571 ghostscript
Control: found 934571 9.27~dfsg-2
Control: notfound 934571 9.27~dfsg-3
Control: found 934571 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u1
Am 16.08.2019 um 02:52 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
> Using 9.27~dfsg-3 there are no problems.
>
Reassign for now. Please discuss w/ ghostscript mai
Using 9.27~dfsg-3 there are no problems.
Am 13.08.2019 um 08:01 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
Hi Igor,
>> I'm wondering what gs version you have. your system information shows
>> you run unstable, hence I'd expect 9.27~dfsg-3. What does "dpkg -l
>> ghostscript" show?
>
> 9.27~dfsg-2
>
Does upgrading to -3.1 solve the issue? It should hav
Am 13.08.2019 um 08:01 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
Hi,
>> I'm wondering what gs version you have. your system information shows
>> you run unstable, hence I'd expect 9.27~dfsg-3. What does "dpkg -l
>> ghostscript" show?
>
> 9.27~dfsg-2
>
Does upgrading to -3 solves the issue?
>> Well, at least
Am 13.08.2019 um 03:25 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
Hi,
> 1. $ md5sum /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb
> f35b44530a1d90eb90fe15d9cba67ea0
> /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb
>
Same here.
> Recent versions of gs removed a lot of gs extensions to get closer
> to stand
1. $ md5sum /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb
f35b44530a1d90eb90fe15d9cba67ea0
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb
2. I reinstalled lmodern package. Same result.
Recent versions of gs removed a lot of gs extensions to get closer to
standard postscript and for some secu
Am 12.08.2019 um 10:46 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
Hi,
> gsftopk(k) 1.19.2
> kpathsea version 6.3.1
> Copyright (C) 1993-1998 Paul Vojta.
>
Just another 2 questiona:
1. is the file "/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmr10.pfb"
present? If yes send me the sha512sum.
2. Could you re-install p
gsftopk(k) 1.19.2
kpathsea version 6.3.1
Copyright (C) 1993-1998 Paul Vojta.
There is NO warranty. You may redistribute this software
under the terms of the GNU General Public License
and the standard X consortium copyright notice.
For more information about these matters, see the files
named COPY
Am 12.08.2019 um 10:04 teilte Igor Liferenko mit:
Hi,
> $ gsftopk rm-lmr10 600
> gsftopk(k) version 1.19.2gs: Error: /undefined in shellarguments
> gs: Operand stack:
> gs:
> gs: Execution stack:
>
Works for me and seems to be rather a problem in ghostscript. Could you
post:
1. gsftopk --versi
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2019.20190605.51237-2
Severity: important
Tags: a11y
Dear Maintainer,
$ gsftopk rm-lmr10 600
gsftopk(k) version 1.19.2gs: Error: /undefined in shellarguments
gs: Operand stack:
gs:
gs: Execution stack:
gs:%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostr
10 matches
Mail list logo
