Bug#935702: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#935702: Wrong DM device size due to integer truncation

2019-08-26 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 11:08:35 +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > Fixed here > https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/commit/8f8f0b3258152a260c6a40be89b485f943f81484 Thanks, Milan! > I'll do minor release soon, but perhaps it would be better to > cherrypick the patch

Bug#935702: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#935702: Wrong DM device size due to integer truncation

2019-08-26 Thread Milan Broz
On 26/08/2019 08:03, Milan Broz wrote: > No need to report it upstream, I'll fix it. This is really stupid bug, all > sizes in code > must be uint_64t. I just wonder why no static analysis screamed here, I run > it on 32bit... Fixed here

Bug#935702: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#935702: Wrong DM device size due to integer truncation

2019-08-26 Thread Milan Broz
On 26/08/2019 03:28, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 12:43:26 +, n...@waifu.club wrote: >> Not only the access to protected data is lost, the integritysetup's "open" >> operation actually succeeds. All reads on the incorrectly created DM device >> will of course fail with I/O

Bug#935702: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#935702: Wrong DM device size due to integer truncation

2019-08-25 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Control: retitle -1 DM device size ≥2³² 512-bits sectors is truncated on 32-bits platforms Control: tag -1 + upstream Hi, On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 12:43:26 +, n...@waifu.club wrote: > Not only the access to protected data is lost, the integritysetup's "open" > operation actually succeeds. All