Hi Christian,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 11:42:58AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Pushing worked after this, thanks.
:-)
> I test-rebuilt all packages with build dependencies on libsvm packages,
> and most of them built successfully. Here are the issues I encountered:
>
> * src:pymvpa2
>
On 11.01.20 06:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:45:15PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:> Strange.
> I did not intentionally set the branch protection. Hope it
> works now.
Pushing worked after this, thanks.
I test-rebuilt all packages with build dependencies on libsvm
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:45:15PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> @Andreas: I can't push my changes to master, I get a protected branch
> error. Could you please grant me the necessary privileges?
Strange. I did not intentionally set the branch protection. Hope it
works now.
> There's a
Hi all,
On 10.01.20 15:33, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> Yes, my changes are merged.
I checked the package and everything looks pretty good. I just added
some minor polishing of my own.
Very surprisingly, not a single symbol has changed since 3.21 -- no
additions, no removals, no changes. It looks as
Hi Christian,
Yes, my changes are merged.
I won't be able to work on it in the next few days. Thanks for your help!
If you want, it would be great to add you as an Uploader since you know
these packages really well.
Thanks,
Chen-Tse
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:14 AM Christian Kastner wrote:
>
On 10.01.20 11:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> since my upload was a bit questionable this gives us the chance
> to discuss it again. What option would you prefer:
>
>1. I just re-upload what is in Git right now to new queue
>2. Somebody who feels more competent takes over
>3. Something
Hi folks,
I somehow missed
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2019-December/076981.html
since my upload was a bit questionable this gives us the chance
to discuss it again. What option would you prefer:
1. I just re-upload what is in Git right now to
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 06:26:49PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> If you like gbp, then it's already a team win :-)
+1
> Yeah, the C++ symbols generated are the mangled versions. You need to
> unmangle them by piping the generated file through c++filt, and then add
> the (c++)
Got it. Thanks! I missed the c++filt part.
Chen-Tse
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 12:27 PM Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2019-12-25 18:08, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> > Thanks Andreas and Christian for the updates/comments. I agree that I
> > should have been more verbose in the changelog. I'm tracing
On 2019-12-25 18:08, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> Thanks Andreas and Christian for the updates/comments. I agree that I
> should have been more verbose in the changelog. I'm tracing all the
> commits to learn more about packaging. I was playing with gbp for
> updating upstream. I really like how it
Thanks Andreas and Christian for the updates/comments. I agree that I
should have been more verbose in the changelog. I'm tracing all the commits
to learn more about packaging. I was playing with gbp for updating
upstream. I really like how it works with git! No worries, my time was not
wasted
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 03:04:47PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2019-12-25 10:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Kind regards
> >
> >Andreas.
>
> I've re-read my original message and feel that I was overly harsh. I was
> irritated about the rushed upgrade as in private communication
On 2019-12-25 10:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
I've re-read my original message and feel that I was overly harsh. I was
irritated about the rushed upgrade as in private communication with
Chen-Tse, I highlighted precisely the possible complexity of this
upgrade and
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:03:00AM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Andreas, what are you doing?
>
> On 2019-12-25 07:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:39:55AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> >> I just submitted a PR for dropping python2 dependencies:
> >>
Andreas, what are you doing?
On 2019-12-25 07:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:39:55AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
>> I just submitted a PR for dropping python2 dependencies:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libsvm/merge_requests/1
>>
>> Any comment is appreciated.
Hi Chen-Tse,
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:39:55AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> Thanks, Andreas.
>
> I just submitted a PR for dropping python2 dependencies:
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libsvm/merge_requests/1
>
> Any comment is appreciated. I'll be working on upgrading to new
Thanks, Andreas.
I just submitted a PR for dropping python2 dependencies:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libsvm/merge_requests/1
Any comment is appreciated. I'll be working on upgrading to new upstream.
Thanks,
Chen-Tse
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 4:03 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:06:37PM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> I have a quick question. Previously the python modules are installed to
> /usr/share/pyshared/. Should I use /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages instead
> if I change it to python3? I see this in the policy and this is also what
>
I have a quick question. Previously the python modules are installed to
/usr/share/pyshared/. Should I use /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages instead
if I change it to python3? I see this in the policy and this is also what
liblinear uses. Just want to double check.
Thanks,
Chen-Tse
On Mon, Dec 23,
Hi Chen-Tse,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:47:44PM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> I'm working on an update which removes dependency on cdbs and python2. I'm
> using liblinear package as the reference. I'll send you something for
> review some time this week.
Thanks a lot. That's really appreciated
Hi Christian, All,
I'm working on an update which removes dependency on cdbs and python2. I'm
using liblinear package as the reference. I'll send you something for
review some time this week.
Thanks,
Chen-Tse
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:26 PM Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Regarding
Hi all,
Regarding liblinear: I thought I already set the Maintainer to Debian
Science Team, I guess I missed it.
On 2019-12-21 20:11, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> I've created an account on Salsa.
>
> Do you think we should remove cdbs and use another build system
> instead? Please let me know if
Hi Chen-Tse,
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 02:11:23PM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> I've created an account on Salsa.
Nice, I've added you to the science-team.
> Do you think we should remove cdbs and use another build system instead?
Yes. Debian Science (and all other teams I'm aware of) are
I've created an account on Salsa.
Do you think we should remove cdbs and use another build system instead?
Please let me know if you have any suggestion. I'm not familiar with other
build systems.
Thanks
Chen-Tse
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 12:27 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Chen-Tse,
>
> thanks
Hi Chen-Tse,
thanks for you quick response.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
> Hi, Andreas,
>
> I agree with your suggestions. Thanks for putting it on salsa!
Thanks for confirming.
> Should I investigate dropping python2? I can spend some time this week on
>
Hi, Andreas,
I agree with your suggestions. Thanks for putting it on salsa!
Should I investigate dropping python2? I can spend some time this week on
this. But I may need help with debian stuff.
Thanks,
Chen-Tse
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:28:57AM +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I second this proposal, and the same for src:liblinear.
That's done as I wrote.
> These are high popcon packages, dependencies for a number of other
> packages. They should be team maintained to unblock important fixes.
To push a bit I
I second this proposal, and the same for src:liblinear.
These are high popcon packages, dependencies for a number of other
packages. They should be team maintained to unblock important fixes.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 08:35:28AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Chen-Tse,
>
> I'm maintaining a
Hi Chen-Tse,
I'm maintaining a package that depends from libsvm. Due to bug #936924
that did not received any response since August it is in danger to be
removed from testing so I'm interested that this bug will be fixed.
When looking at the package I realised that while it would fit into
Debian
29 matches
Mail list logo
