Bug#937738: python-et-xmlfile: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-2.1

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I'd have been happy to, but at the time, DPMT was using git-dpm and it > didn't seem worth learning to use an unmaintained tool just to package a > couple of python modules. yeah, i feel you, and since then we migrated to salsa and a plain gbp + pristine-tar workflow -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My

Bug#937738: python-et-xmlfile: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-2.1

2020-02-02 Thread Afif Elghraoui
On ٨‏/٦‏/١٤٤١ هـ ١٢:١٥ م, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Control: tags 937738 + patch > > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for python-et-xmlfile (versioned as 1.0.1-2.1). The diff > is attached to this message. > > Consider maintaining this package with the DPMT > I'd have been happy to,

Bug#937738: python-et-xmlfile: diff for NMU version 1.0.1-2.1

2020-02-02 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags 937738 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for python-et-xmlfile (versioned as 1.0.1-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. Consider maintaining this package with the DPMT Regards. diff -Nru python-et-xmlfile-1.0.1/debian/changelog