Matthias Klose:
> On 16.10.19 22:08, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Matthias Klose:
>>> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>>>
>>> On 29.09.19 11:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
[...]
When would you need to keep these LTO sections (but n
On 16.10.19 22:08, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Matthias Klose:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 29.09.19 11:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
[...]
When would you need to keep these LTO sections (but not use -k to keep
everything)?
-k is aliased as --keep
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Matthias Klose:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On 29.09.19 11:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> When would you need to keep these LTO sections (but not use -k to keep
>> everything)?
>
> -k is aliased as --keep-debug, this has no
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 29.09.19 11:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Matthias Klose:
Package: debhelper,lintian
Severity: important
Some packages build with link time optimizations enabled, which is ok,
whoever then these packages may ship with static libs which still
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Matthias Klose:
> Package: debhelper,lintian
> Severity: important
>
> Some packages build with link time optimizations enabled, which is ok,
> whoever then these packages may ship with static libs which still have
> the LTO information in some sections of the object fil
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Please find attached a patch stripping the LTO information, together with an
option to explicitly keep it.
lintian probably only needs to warn about the sections found in static archives.
* dh_strip: Strip LTO sections unless --keep-lto i
Hi Matthias,
> >> Please feel free to split this issue into separate debhelper and lintian
> >> tasks
> >> once a solution is agreed upon.
[…]
> sorry, I don't understand: the issue is submitted to both debhelper and
> lintian. So what can of information do you expect, and who should
> provide t
On 08.09.19 09:53, Chris Lamb wrote:
tags 939656 + moreinfo
thanks
Matthias Klose wrote:
Please feel free to split this issue into separate debhelper and lintian tasks
once a solution is agree upon.
Sure thing. As I am not well-versed enough in this lower-level stuff (!)
am marking as morein
tags 939656 + moreinfo
thanks
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please feel free to split this issue into separate debhelper and lintian
> tasks
> once a solution is agree upon.
Sure thing. As I am not well-versed enough in this lower-level stuff (!)
am marking as moreinfo simply from the perspective of
Package: debhelper,lintian
Severity: important
Some packages build with link time optimizations enabled, which is ok, whoever
then these packages may ship with static libs which still have the LTO
information in some sections of the object files (e.g. ext2fsprogs). This is
not desired in most
10 matches
Mail list logo
