severity 939763 serious
thanks
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Is sphinxsearch still of use or should it be removed from unstable and
> not included in bullseye?
I'm raising this to serious because I think the situation of the
sphinxsearch package is not good and we would need to explicitly
Hello
Manticore team's member here.
Vasyl Gello asked me to step in. Just few notes:
1) On behalf of Manticore team I can assure we can help with pushing and
maintaining Manticore's packages for Debian. We have build procedures for
Debian 8/9/10 as well as and CI and pre-release production
Dear colleagues,
>It has unsafe defaults in sample files with listener
> listening to 0.0.0.0, cf. #939762.
Unfortunately version 3.1.1 is also prone to #939762.
It is not maintained anymore so there are two alternatives:
* Switch to Manticore Search, the maintained fork by Manticore Software.
Source: sphinxsearch
Severity: important
Hi
While checking another issue I noticed that sphinxsearch is at 2.2.11
since stretch and was never updated to as well more recent 3.x
version. It has unsafe defaults in sample files with listener
listening to 0.0.0.0, cf. #939762.
Is sphinxsearch still
4 matches
Mail list logo
