tags 941075 +unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 04:34:21PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
>No, it means you can close the bug, and absolutely nothing else.
Why you open an issue, if you are not intended to help with it's
solution?
Lets reiterate my question:
--->8--
I don't understand.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
>Never you mind, you can close the bug.
Is that means the problem was identified right, i.e. you are
using initscript /etc/init.d/monit directly?
>On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:06 PM Sergey B Kirpichev
>
tags 941075 +moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
> The current monit package does not include a systemctl file, often resulting
> in
> monit not running. If I'd check the status with systemctl the result was:
> active(exited) see also:
Package: monit
Version: 1:5.26.0-1~bpo10+1
Severity: important
The current monit package does not include a systemctl file, often resulting in
monit not running. If I'd check the status with systemctl the result was:
active(exited) see also: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/241970/what-
4 matches
Mail list logo
