Bug#942898: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#942898: debcargo: reduce the impact of debcargo-built crates on the package index, and facilitate debian packaging of crates

2019-10-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-10-23 13:27:00 +, Ximin Luo wrote: > [ dkg wrote: ] >> I have not yet gotten measurements of what kinds of costs we're talking >> about with respect to this shared resource. If someone could provide >> some numbers and a methodology for getting them, that would be useful in >>

Bug#942898: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#942898: debcargo: reduce the impact of debcargo-built crates on the package index, and facilitate debian packaging of crates

2019-10-23 Thread Ximin Luo
Daniel Kahn Gillmor: > > Proposed Solutions > -- > > AIUI, the FTP team thinks that debcargo could reduce the impact on the > shared resource of the Packages index by adopting one or both of the > tactics described below: > > 0) reduce the number of "+feature" .debs produced by

Bug#942898: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#942898: debcargo: reduce the impact of debcargo-built crates on the package index, and facilitate debian packaging of crates

2019-10-23 Thread Ximin Luo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible wontfix Daniel Kahn Gillmor: > [..] > > Problem Statement(s) > > > From talking with the FTP team, the concern appears to be that the large > number of packages, and the large number of Provides produced for some > of the packages is

Bug#942898: debcargo: reduce the impact of debcargo-built crates on the package index, and facilitate debian packaging of crates

2019-10-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: debcargo Version: 2.4.0-1 Control: affects -1 ftp.debian.org Hi! I'm trying to summarize in this report the state of conversation i had today between members of the FTP team (and others on #debian-ftp) and members the debian Rust packaging team. We seem to be in a bit of an impasse,