Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:27:46AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (dropping debian-release and debian-python since it's kind of irrelevant)
>
> 在 2020-02-28五的 05:30 +0100，Johannes Schauer写道：
> > Quoting peter green (2020-02-27 22:54:19)
> > > > Relevant packages and bugs:
> > > >
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:27:46AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> What I know currently:
>
> 1. git-buildpackage build-depends on rpm
> 2. src:rpm build-depends on python2, provides python-rpm
> 3. git-buildpackage has python-rpm in debian/tests/control
> 4. the only reverse-build-dependency for
Hi all,
(dropping debian-release and debian-python since it's kind of irrelevant)
在 2020-02-28五的 05:30 +0100，Johannes Schauer写道：
> Quoting peter green (2020-02-27 22:54:19)
> > > Relevant packages and bugs:
> > > 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> > This bug is not
Quoting peter green (2020-02-27 22:54:19)
> > Relevant packages and bugs:
> > 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> This bug is not marked as rc.
>
> Nevertheless I believe that this bug report is in-fact a false positive. From
> what I can tell git-buildpackage, even in
Relevant packages and bugs:
943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
This bug is not marked as rc.
Nevertheless I believe that this bug report is in-fact a false positive. From
what I can tell git-buildpackage, even in buster, does not (build-)depend on
python 2 or any
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:14:08PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I looked again and I was looking at an old version. Sorry for the
> noise. I still think we have problems with these
> 937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> 938622 tahoe-lafs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> which I
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:28:03AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FYI. The widespread impact of this not so apparent because
> git-buildpackage is typically used ad-hoc by maintainers, rather than
> via (Build)-Depends.
>
> Relevant packages and bugs:
> 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to
python2 transition"):
> Yes, and as far as I can see after pydoctor migrates the only problem with
> gbp will be python-rpm in debian/tests/control, which is probably
> unneeded.
Oh.
> > the py2 rot seems wider including
FYI. The widespread impact of this not so apparent because
git-buildpackage is typically used ad-hoc by maintainers, rather than
via (Build)-Depends.
Relevant packages and bugs:
943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
938622
9 matches
Mail list logo
