Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 pending Hi all, cgal migrated to testing. The transition is finished after the autoremoval of k3d and rheolef in a couple of days, or when their fixed, whatever happens first. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-08 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/8/19 7:15 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > openemsbinNMU would be sufficient, unrelated FTBFS >(#946264), but not on autoremoval list (WHY?) RC bug report is too young. " Packages which have RC bugs that are present in both testing and unstable, and which have no

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-08 Thread Joachim Reichel
Update on the current state: cloudcompare binNMU successful, all green gudhi binNMU successful, all green mshr binNMU successful, all green openfoam binNMU successful, all green openscad fixed by maintainer, all green pygalmesh fixed by maintainer, all green

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-07 Thread Joachim Reichel
Hi Paul, could you please trigger another binNMU for gudhi on mips64el? There was a problem in CGAL that I fixed in 5.0-5. Thanks, Joachim

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > sfcgal fixed by maintainer, but armhf and mips64el still missing It built fine on mips64el, armhf is a new. RM bug: #946261 > pprepair FTBFS, no patch known (#944775), autoremoval in 13 days > prepairFTBFS, no patch known

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-06 Thread Joachim Reichel
Update on the current state: cloudcompare binNMU successful, all green mshr binNMU successful, all green openfoam binNMU successful, all green openscad fixed by maintainer, all green gudhi binNMU successful, but mips64el still missing sfcgal fixed by

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Joachim, On 03-12-2019 08:31, Joachim Reichel wrote: > I've contacted the maintainers on Nov. 11th about the upcoming transition and > included my patches, but did not file bugs so far. I suggest you file those bugs against the packages that you're not in contact

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-02 Thread Joachim Reichel
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi Paul, On 02.12.19 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote: > Have those patches been submitted to the BTS? Are the maintainers of > these packages aware of this? Are the changes trivial and are you ready > to NMU them (except rheolef)? I've contacted the maintainers on Nov. 11th

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-12-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Joachim, On 15-11-2019 17:27, Joachim Reichel wrote: > crrcsimneeds source code changes, patch available [...] > k3dneeds source code changes, patch available [...] > openscad needs source code changes, patch available > pgrouting needs source code

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-11-15 Thread Joachim Reichel
Update: crrcsimneeds source code changes, patch available gudhi binNMU should be sufficient k3dneeds source code changes, patch available openemsbinNMU should be sufficient openscad needs source code changes, patch available pgrouting needs source code changes, patch

Bug#944417: transition: cgal

2019-11-09 Thread Joachim Reichel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I'd like to request a transition slot for CGAL 5.0. The CGAL library is now header-only, i.e., the two library packages "libcgal13" and "libcgal-qt5-14" are now gone. Status of