On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > openjdk-13 does have the problem, so we could do another upload, but
> > given that it's not an LTS release and 14 is already available and
> > patched, do we need to?
>
> Good question. It's easy to do, and it does fix a bug, so
* Julian Gilbey:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:22:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * tony mancill:
>>
>> > I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
>> > the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
>> > ahead and upload that package today.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 06:22:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * tony mancill:
>
> > I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
> > the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
> > ahead and upload that package today.
>
> There's also an
* tony mancill:
> I had already prepared the NMU for openjdk-15 - building first without
> the patch and then with it so I could test with both - so I will go
> ahead and upload that package today.
There's also an upstream change to honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH:
commit
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:21:46PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Great, and there's a bug report #944738
> > >
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:21:46PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Great, and there's a bug report #944738
> > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944738) for
> > openjdk-11; I haven't checked if there are bugs reported
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:47:52PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > Obviously, similar builds will be needed for openjdk-{11,13,14,15}.
> >
> > Yes, I will start working on the others.
>
> Great, and there's a bug report #944738
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:47:52PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Super! I wonder, though, why it didn't work for me first time round?
> > I rebuilt it and it worked the second time, though. So maybe I
> > changed something.
>
> The rebuild of openjdk-14, including tests and the ad-hoc jlink
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:09:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > dh_strip_nondeterminism gets its timestamp from the debian/changelog
> > > file, while strip-nondeterminism strips the timestamps.
> > >
> > > So here's a
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:09:28AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > dh_strip_nondeterminism gets its timestamp from the debian/changelog
> > file, while strip-nondeterminism strips the timestamps.
> >
> > So here's a replacement patch which fixes everything except
> > java.naming.jmod. I have to
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:45:23PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > * Run the sha256sum command (protected with a '-' in case it fails!)
> > > at several points in the build-arch and install targets to see when
> > > the hashes
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > * Run the sha256sum command (protected with a '-' in case it fails!)
> > at several points in the build-arch and install targets to see when
> > the hashes change, if at all.
>
> Good idea. I am doing that now, and also
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > One other thing I wanted to mention is what I'm using for a test case:
> >
> > jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
> >
> > This fails,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:49:24PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> [...]
>
> One other thing I wanted to mention is what I'm using for a test case:
>
> jlink --add-modules java.desktop --output test
>
> This fails, complaining about the hash of java.xml recorded in
> java.base. But other
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:24:36PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:03:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > > >
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:03:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > > [...]
> > > Julian, I applied the patch and built the package
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> > [...]
> > Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfully, but
> > jlink still fails with the "expected hash" error. It's
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:59:22PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
> [...]
> Julian, I applied the patch and built the package successfully, but
> jlink still fails with the "expected hash" error. It's (perhaps)
> interesting that the expected hash does differ between the
Hi Tiago, hi Julian,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:13:55PM -0300, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
> is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
Yes, that's a good point. Once the upload is ready (see below), I
Dear Tony and Tiago,
Pleasure! Needs forced me to do so ;-)
Best wishes,
Julian
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:13:55PM -0300, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
> is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
>
Hi Tony,
Matthias is the actual Debian Maintainer, but in my opinion the patch
is great and should be ok to go do an upload including it.
Thanks Julian for the investigation and figuring out how to fix this
problem, I really appreciate it. =)
Best regards,
Tiago
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:12
21 matches
Mail list logo
