(resending as a signed-mail, and with the TS included)
On 05.01.20 10:27, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> I would propose to add the workaround for s390x and wait for new test
> results for armhf resp. ignore them for ppc64el, as they where not
> reproducible. If no one disagrees I will do a NMU and c
Hi,
* Gianfranco Costamagna [2019-12-22 12:29]:
Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on:
armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf
I wasn't able to reproduce this on harris.d.o nor on a private machine.
ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a
Hello,
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:29:49 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> control: unarchive -1
> control: reopen -1
>
> Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on:
> armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf
> ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/
control: unarchive -1
control: reopen -1
Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on:
armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf
ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/ppc64el
s390x: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/s39
4 matches
Mail list logo