Bug#944742: fixed in assimp 5.0.0~ds2-4

2020-01-08 Thread Debian/GNU
(resending as a signed-mail, and with the TS included) On 05.01.20 10:27, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > I would propose to add the workaround for s390x and wait for new test > results for armhf resp. ignore them for ppc64el, as they where not > reproducible. If no one disagrees I will do a NMU and c

Bug#944742: fixed in assimp 5.0.0~ds2-4

2020-01-05 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi, * Gianfranco Costamagna [2019-12-22 12:29]: Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on: armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf I wasn't able to reproduce this on harris.d.o nor on a private machine. ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a

Bug#944742: fixed in assimp 5.0.0~ds2-4

2020-01-01 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:29:49 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: unarchive -1 > control: reopen -1 > > Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on: > armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf > ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/

Bug#944742: fixed in assimp 5.0.0~ds2-4

2019-12-22 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: unarchive -1 control: reopen -1 Hello, looks like we still have segfaults/failures on: armhf: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/armhf ppc64el: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/ppc64el s390x: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/assimp/focal/s39