On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:29:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> You are perfectly right - but I'm wondering why the bug is listed as
> open in BTS (also the typical "Done" is missing in the header of the bug
> report). Despite it seems to be open per BTS the package migrated to
> testing.
Maybe the
Hi Gregor,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:26:30AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:53:02 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > it seems we need some help again for this issue. Despite
> > libbio-db-hts-perl depends libbio-perl-perl which contains
> >
> >
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:53:02 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> it seems we need some help again for this issue. Despite
> libbio-db-hts-perl depends libbio-perl-perl which contains
>
>/usr/share/perl5/Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm
>
> the test fails. Any idea what might be wrong here?
Isn't this
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Debian-Perl team,
it seems we need some help again for this issue. Despite
libbio-db-hts-perl depends libbio-perl-perl which contains
/usr/share/perl5/Bio/SeqFeature/Lite.pm
the test fails. Any idea what might be wrong here?
Thanks for any help
Andreas.
--
Source: libbio-db-hts-perl
Version: 3.01-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of libbio-db-hts-perl you added an autopkgtest to
libbio-db-hts-perl, great. However, it fails. I
5 matches
Mail list logo
