Bug#949135: transition: netcdf-fortran

2020-01-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/23/20 5:15 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 1/22/20 9:40 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 17-01-2020 11:22, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> Am I correct in saying that it makes a lot of sense to take this >> transition together with the netcdf transition? If so, please combine >> that transition

Bug#949135: transition: netcdf-fortran

2020-01-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/22/20 9:40 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 17-01-2020 11:22, Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition. > > Please go ahead. Thanks. > Am I correct in saying that it makes a lot of sense to take this > transition together with the netcdf transition? If

Bug#949135: transition: netcdf-fortran

2020-01-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Bas, On 17-01-2020 11:22, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition. Please go ahead. Am I correct in saying that it makes a lot of sense to take this transition together with the netcdf transition? If so, please combine that

Bug#949135: transition: netcdf-fortran

2020-01-17 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf-fortran.html Control: block -1 by 949132 949134 netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition.