Bug#949227: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-7

2020-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/19/20 2:02 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Thanks, but I don't need you to micro-manage the bugs in the BTS for me. > > I'm not really micro-managing anything for you. I'm just making sure > that the information in the BTS is

Bug#949227: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-7

2020-02-19 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Thanks, but I don't need you to micro-manage the bugs in the BTS for me. I'm not really micro-managing anything for you. I'm just making sure that the information in the BTS is correct. Not necessarily for you, but for anybody

Bug#949227: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-7

2020-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/18/20 1:26 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > reopen 949227 > found 949227 4.5.0-4 > fixed 949227 4.5.0-7 > retitle 949227 python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate > thanks > > Reopening because packages in stable *must* build in stable. > In fact, it fails right now, without

Bug#949227: fixed in python-pysaml2 4.5.0-7

2020-02-18 Thread Santiago Vila
reopen 949227 found 949227 4.5.0-4 fixed 949227 4.5.0-7 retitle 949227 python-pysaml2: FTBFS in buster because of expired certificate thanks Reopening because packages in stable *must* build in stable. In fact, it fails right now, without waiting to 2020-11-28. Error message says something like