Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Samuel Am 25.04.20 um 16:37 schrieb Samuel Henrique: > But it doesn't works with: > override_dh_auto_configure: > dh_auto_configure -prsync-udeb -- --with-included-zlib=yes > --disable-acl-support dh_auto_configure does not act on binary packages > dh_auto_configure

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-25 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Michael, > > I appreciate the suggestion, I assumed that it would be a simple > > workaround, but tried to make use of "--disable-acl-support", "export > > enable_acl_support="no"" and "--enable-acl-support="no"" (which I > > assumed would work, by looking at configure.sh and configure.ac)

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-22 Thread Michael Biebl
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:52:08 +0100 Samuel Henrique wrote: > Hello everyone, cc'ing Paul Slootman (maintainer of rsync since 2003) > as he might help me here, > > For reference, bug log on BTS: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949712 > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 17:29, Cyril

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-19 Thread Samuel Henrique
Control: tags -1 patch Dropping people who are probably not interested in this from now on, Hello Guillem, I created a patch based on the udeb implementation for libattr1, autopkgtest has 3 failures but those were happening before the patch so I assume it's not an issue. The patch is attached

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Guillem Jover (2020-04-14): > I thought having xattr and ACL support in an rsync-udeb did make sense, > because as you say, if you want to use it to initialize a filesystem > then you probably want all file attributes to be preserved as much as > possible. libattr might not be used on some arches

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-14 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 17:52:08 +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 17:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Guillem Jover (2020-01-26): > > > I'm also not sure whether it would make sense to add also an acl-udeb > > > binary package, which would match for example the attr-udeb one. >

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-04-13 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello everyone, cc'ing Paul Slootman (maintainer of rsync since 2003) as he might help me here, For reference, bug log on BTS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949712 On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 17:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Guillem Jover (2020-01-26): > > I'm also not sure

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-01-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello, Guillem Jover (2020-01-26): > On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 22:33:52 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > Package: libacl1 > > Version: 2.2.53-5 > > Severity: wishlist > > > Hello Maintainer, as per requested in #729069 (rsync package) > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729069 >

Bug#949712: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)

2020-01-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 22:33:52 +, Samuel Henrique wrote: > Package: libacl1 > Version: 2.2.53-5 > Severity: wishlist > Hello Maintainer, as per requested in #729069 (rsync package) > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729069 > > I would like to provide an udeb for rsync,