[Alexandre Viau]
> I have just uploaded a new version of opendht.
>
> For the next step I will attempt to build Jami to see if there is
> anything missing.
Hi. Is there any progress on this?
I see there is a new version of restino available, perhaps time to
update it? I doubt it will solve the
On 2020-05-15 5:48 a.m., Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Alexandre Viau]
>>> The next step would now be to update OpenDHT, which should be quick
>>> once restinio passes new.
>>
>> The restinio package was just accepted into
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:30:03AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Alexandre Viau]
> > The next step would now be to update OpenDHT, which should be quick
> > once restinio passes new.
>
> The restinio package was just accepted into unstable.
I am half way through opendht [1]. My package
[Alexandre Viau]
> The next step would now be to update OpenDHT, which should be quick
> once restinio passes new.
The restinio package was just accepted into unstable.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/restinio >
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtse
Yes, go ahead!
Sorry I couldn't do it myself quicker, I tend to work on Debian only
on the weekends.
Thank you for your work!! :)
The next step would now be to update OpenDHT, which should be quick
once restinio passes new.
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Viau
av...@debian.org
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at
On 04/05 10:31, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> > I add a basic d/salsa-ci.yml, that should tell us what's going on.
>
> All the unit tests are passing in salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/restinio/-/jobs/717236#L1500
Hi Alexandre,
in the current state, do you think I should upload
On 04/05 09:18, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> I re-ran the build this morning from the repository you created, and it
> passes here in sbuild; TTBOMK it's only binding its test router to
> 127.0.0.1, and not trying to reach anything outside, but I may be
> missing something.
>
> I add a basic
On 03/05 19:40, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Also, I notice that the package's Changelog already has two entries,
> but was it even uploaded once? Should it say UNRELEASED instead, until
> it is uploaded, or should I understand that it was uploaded?
This was my mistake, it should have said UNRELEASED
On 2020-04-28 7:19 a.m., Felix Salfelder wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> Towards the original goal (getting Jami into Debian), I have reworded
> the cmake patch description and improved the package based on your
> proposed changes.
>
> - cleanup
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> It was perfectly clear the first time, and this is where we can agree to
> disagree.
Dear Sébastien.
Yes, lets agree.
> Starting on this project I had a couple of goals.
Towards the original goal (getting Jami into Debian),
On 27/04 13:13, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> I hope it is more clear now, how I prefer to use the small tarball
> over running the tests, as a matter of principle
It was perfectly clear the first time, and this is where we can agree to
disagree. Starting on this project I had a couple of goals, and
Thanks Sébastien for your analysis.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:10:35PM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> Before you go ahead on any of this, please let's wait for Alexandre's
> input.
I agree.
> I am unsure where your gut feeling comes from: the smaller package is OK
> to simply use as an
On 27/04 11:02, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> > - salsa-ci
> >
> > - open an issue upstream to integrate my two cmake patches for the
> > scenario "build a release without shipping binaries, yet
> > insist on running the tests during our build"
>
> I will see what I can do about these.
Please apologise the flood, I missed something obvious.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> The freshly imported tarball (0.6.6) contains an embedded dev/asio
> directory, which does not exist in the upstream repository, nor was it
> in the 0.6.4 tarball. I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:07:36AM +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
> I've pushed my version of restinio's packaging to
> [..]
> Let me know if you want me to upload what I've got now to NEW.
amazing. thank you.
> So we don't forget, here are a couple of items we'll want to fix later
> on:
>
>
I've pushed my version of restinio's packaging to
https://salsa.debian.org/seb/restinio's master branch. I started from
Felix's initial effort, but a lot of things were missing:
- d/copyright severely lacking
- missing build-deps (most notably on cmake) initially prevented
building as-is
16 matches
Mail list logo
