Andreas Beckmann dixit:
>Both ksh and ksh93 ship the same .kshrc. I assume, ksh93 will go away at
>some point in the future even if its alternative currently has higher
No, we deliberately brought it back, as ksh2020 development goes
into different directions and has different goals, e.g.
On 01/03/2020 02.28, Anuradha Weeraman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:44:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> I had considered that, but creating a ksh-common package for just
>> one file, which in addition to that is a skeleton file that is not
>> used during normal operation, just adduser,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:44:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I had considered that, but creating a ksh-common package for just
> one file, which in addition to that is a skeleton file that is not
> used during normal operation, just adduser, seems overkill. The
> sequence of installing both
Hi Andreas,
> apt-get install ksh
> # (1)
> apt-get install ksh93
> apt-get remove ksh93
> # (2)
>
>The list of installed files at points (1) and (2) should be identical,
>but the following files have disappeared:
>
> /etc/skel/.kshrc
>
>(also happens with both packages swapped)
yes, this
Package: ksh,ksh93
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks
Control: found -1 2020.0.0-5
Control: found -1 93u+20120801-6
Hi,
during a test with piuparts and DOSE tools I noticed your package causes
removal of files that also belong to another
5 matches
Mail list logo
