Bug#954189: Backport to buster?

2020-06-18 Thread Ralph Giles
Please backport the 0.2.1 package from bullseye to buster. The 0.0.62 package currently in buster no longer works for new installs, and will stop working for renewals of current domain certificates in July 2020. The 0.2.1 tag of acmetool is two years old and should build with the golang 1.11

Bug#954189: Backport to buster?

2020-04-27 Thread Pali Rohár
On Monday 27 April 2020 11:15:30 Paul van Tilburg wrote: > Hi! > > This bug report was originally about buster and in my opinion a > backport is necessary (stretch also had one). I reckon mostly servers > use Let's Encrypt, and they mostly run Debian buster/stable. > Given that upstream doesn't

Bug#954189: Backport to buster?

2020-04-27 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hi! This bug report was originally about buster and in my opinion a backport is necessary (stretch also had one). I reckon mostly servers use Let's Encrypt, and they mostly run Debian buster/stable. Given that upstream doesn't seem to change to that much, is that a possibility? I didn't reopen