Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-04-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: reassign -1 libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.067-1 Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:40:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-03-31 21:49:51 [+0200], Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Kurt, > Hi Salvatore, > > > I see, but then I prefer to loop in

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-04-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-03-31 21:49:51 [+0200], Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Kurt, Hi Salvatore, > I see, but then I prefer to loop in Steffen Ullrich into the loop > (upstream of IO::Socket::SSL). Steffen, see the above comment from > Kurt in the Debian bug, so it looks we cannot close >

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:48:26PM +0200, Steffen Ullrich wrote: > > You should fix your tests not to trigger an unexpected EOF. You > > probably have code now that ignores the current error, you > > shouldn't ignore that error, it's a real error. > > Fixing the tests to only consider an ideal

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Steffen Ullrich
> You should fix your tests not to trigger an unexpected EOF. You > probably have code now that ignores the current error, you > shouldn't ignore that error, it's a real error. Fixing the tests to only consider an ideal world of nicely behaving peers is in my opinion the wrong way to go. Instead

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 06:46:44PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:31:21PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > >

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Kurt, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 06:46:44PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:31:21PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:50:08 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > >

Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:31:21PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:50:08 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > > > The package FTBFS since openssl has been updated to 1.1.1e because the > > >

Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-31 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: reassign 954371 src:openssl 1.1.1e-1 Control: affects 954371 + libio-socket-ssl-perl Hi, On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:31:21PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:50:08 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > The package FTBFS since openssl has been updated to

Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:50:08 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The package FTBFS since openssl has been updated to 1.1.1e because the > testsuite fails. The failure is due to commit db943f43a60d ("Detect EOF > while reading in libssl") [0] in openssl. There an issue ticket [1] > which

Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-03-20 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Package: libio-socket-ssl-perl Version: 2.067-1 Severity: serious The package FTBFS since openssl has been updated to 1.1.1e because the testsuite fails. The failure is due to commit db943f43a60d ("Detect EOF while reading in libssl") [0] in openssl. There an issue ticket [1] which introduced the