On 16/04/2020 10:08, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Let's go ahead.
>
> gnome-desktop3 has migrated, but gnome-shell and mutter have not. We're
> now getting reports that GNOME Shell in testing is crashing because it
> indirectly
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Let's go ahead.
gnome-desktop3 has migrated, but gnome-shell and mutter have not. We're
now getting reports that GNOME Shell in testing is crashing because it
indirectly loads more than one copy of gnome-desktop3.
Would it be
On 15/04/2020 09:53, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:42:46 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gnome-desktop3.html
>> - Should be ready to start binNMUs
>> - Please binNMU xdg-desktop-portal-gtk in
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:42:46 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gnome-desktop3.html
> - Should be ready to start binNMUs
> - Please binNMU xdg-desktop-portal-gtk in experimental too
> - No point in binNMUing
budgie-desktop has now been transitioned to unstable.
thx
David
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 13:42, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Let's go ahead. The situation looks to be in a good state. Extensions have
> > always been treated
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 12:27:04 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Let's go ahead. The situation looks to be in a good state. Extensions have
> always been treated this way, on a best effort basis during the transitions,
> so
> we'll keep as many as we can but if any of them aren't compatible
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 08/04/2020 14:22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-04-08 11:46:59 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
It would probably make most sense to treat gnome-desktop3 and mutter as
a single transition, as we have often
On 2020-04-08 11:46:59 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > It would probably make most sense to treat gnome-desktop3 and mutter as
> > > a single transition, as we have often done in the past: upstream will
> > > not have tested arbitrary mixtures of
On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > It would probably make most sense to treat gnome-desktop3 and mutter as
> > a single transition, as we have often done in the past: upstream will
> > not have tested arbitrary mixtures of 3.34 and 3.36.
Progress on this:
After chasing regressions
On 21/03/2020 13:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: moreinfo
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
>
> You've probably seen that parts of GNOME 3.36 (libraries with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
You've probably seen that parts of GNOME 3.36 (libraries with stable
API/ABI, and leaf applications) are starting to make
11 matches
Mail list logo
