Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastiaan, On 22-10-2020 09:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Some more allow-uninst hints are likely needed for the other packages. > > Thanks for the additional allow-uninst hints, it finally let openjfx > migrate to testing. You're welcome. Thanks for pinging me. Paul signature.asc

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-22 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Paul, On 10/21/20 4:30 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:07:28 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: >> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 06:30:51 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: The binaries for the 32-bit architectures were removed in #962915 [1], but only for version 4.13.0-1 in uns

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-21 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Paul, On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 10:07:28 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 06:30:51 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > The binaries for the 32-bit architectures were removed in #962915 [1], > > > but only for version 4.13.0-1 in unstable. > > > > This was not sufficient to let it

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 06:30:51 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > The binaries for the 32-bit architectures were removed in #962915 [1], > > but only for version 4.13.0-1 in unstable. > > This was not sufficient to let it migrate to testing. > > The britney

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-05 Thread tony mancill
It turns out there was already an RM bug filed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969975 I will merge the duplicate I created into it: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971730

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-05 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 06:30:51AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10/5/20 6:04 AM, tony mancill wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> Control: severity -1 serious > >> Control: affects -1 src:openjfx > >> > >> This issue is preventing testi

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/5/20 6:04 AM, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Control: severity -1 serious >> Control: affects -1 src:openjfx >> >> This issue is preventing testing migration of swt4-gtk, it also blocks >> openjfx builds on the architectures whe

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-04 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: affects -1 src:openjfx > > This issue is preventing testing migration of swt4-gtk, it also blocks > openjfx builds on the architectures where swt4-gtk FTBFS preventing the > fix for #96

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-10-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: severity -1 serious Control: affects -1 src:openjfx This issue is preventing testing migration of swt4-gtk, it also blocks openjfx builds on the architectures where swt4-gtk FTBFS preventing the fix for #967185 from migrating to testing. Either fix the build or request removal of swt4-gt

Bug#960769: swt4-gtk FTBFS on 32bit

2020-05-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: swt4-gtk Version: 4.15.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=swt4-gtk&suite=sid ... callback.c:697:2: error: initializer element is not constant 697 | (jlong)FN(0, args), \ | ^ ...