Followup-For: Bug #961195
Please also binNMU zeek/experimental
nmu zeek_3.0.7+ds1-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against glibc 2.31."
Andreas
On 2020-07-27 08:49:47 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >...
> > - nageru_2.0.0-3: This package is using lld as the linker instead of
> > ld, and it is over picky about the usage of the __*_finite functions
> > in dynamic librar
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>...
> - nageru_2.0.0-3: This package is using lld as the linker instead of
> ld, and it is over picky about the usage of the __*_finite functions
> in dynamic libraries (here libx264.so). The package builds fine with
> l
On 13/07/2020 21:39, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-07-13 20:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> Hi Aurelien,
>>
>> On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226
On 2020-07-13 20:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231
> >> thanks
> >
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Aurelien,
On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231
>> thanks
>
> Does it mean that we need to have those bugs fixed before starting th
On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231
> thanks
Does it mean that we need to have those bugs fixed before starting the
transition? Or can we start the transition and fix them at the same
time?
Beside busybox,
On 2020-06-04 14:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 6/4/20 2:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-06-04 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >>> Package: release.debian.org
> >>> Severity: normal
> >>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >>> User
On 6/4/20 2:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-06-04 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>>> Dear release team,
>>>
>>> I wou
On 2020-06-04 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc
On 6/4/20 1:06 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.31. It is
On 5/21/20 11:39 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.31. It is available in
> experimental for more than 2 mont
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.31. It is available in
experimental for more than 2 months and there are no known issues or
regression. It has been
13 matches
Mail list logo
