Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

2020-06-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:33 pm, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Pirate Praveen dijo [Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0530]: The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 I'd like a confirmation from you if

Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

2020-06-19 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Pirate Praveen dijo [Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0530]: > The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 > > I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your > recommendations or not. I think

Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

2020-06-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 4:55:52 PM IST, David Bremner wrote: >Pirate Praveen writes: > >> Package: tech-ctte >> >> Hi, >> >> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 >> >> I'd like a confirmation from you

Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

2020-06-19 Thread David Bremner
Pirate Praveen writes: > Package: tech-ctte > > Hi, > > The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 > > I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations > or not. I think

Bug#963112: Request for advice on katex rejected by ftp masters

2020-06-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: tech-ctte Hi, The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations or not. I think katex should be a separate binary package