On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:33 pm, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Pirate Praveen dijo [Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0530]:
The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was
given at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
I'd like a confirmation from you if
Pirate Praveen dijo [Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0530]:
> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
>
> I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your
> recommendations or not. I think
On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 4:55:52 PM IST, David Bremner wrote:
>Pirate Praveen writes:
>
>> Package: tech-ctte
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
>>
>> I'd like a confirmation from you
Pirate Praveen writes:
> Package: tech-ctte
>
> Hi,
>
> The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
>
> I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations
> or not. I think
Package: tech-ctte
Hi,
The general case was discussed earlier and a recommendation was given at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54
I'd like a confirmation from you if katex was following your recommendations or
not. I think katex should be a separate binary package
5 matches
Mail list logo