Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Adrian,
On 25-06-2020 10:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> This works:
Applied in git. Will upload after I investigated the autopkgtest
failures and the lazarus build failures. (Help with that welcome).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
Hi!
On 6/25/20 10:22 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 6/25/20 9:01 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> It seems more a packaging problem to me. Normally bootstrapping is very
>> simple, but for some reason, FPC is not using the proper paths.
>>
>> I will talk to the upstream contacts
On 6/25/20 9:01 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> It seems more a packaging problem to me. Normally bootstrapping is very
> simple, but for some reason, FPC is not using the proper paths.
>
> I will talk to the upstream contacts I have and see if they can help
> me.
Okay, I got it. Will send
Hi Adrian,
On 24-06-2020 19:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Unfortunately, I have not been able to successfully bootstrap FPC on
> Debian using the binaries provided by upstream due to issues with the
> install path ("powerpc64-linux" vs. "powerpc64el-linux").
>
> After spending more than
Hi Paul!
On 6/25/20 8:57 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 24-06-2020 19:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I have not been able to successfully bootstrap FPC on
>> Debian using the binaries provided by upstream due to issues with the
>> install path ("powerpc64-linux" vs. "powerpc64
Source: fpc
Version: 3.2.0~rc1+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
Hello!
FPC 3.2.0 officially supports ppc64el and Fedora is already building it.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to successfully bootstrap FPC on
Debian using the binaries provided b
6 matches
Mail list logo
