John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:24:59 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 7/4/20 1:32 PM, наб wrote:
> > This fixes, e.g., hurd installs from mini ISOs,
> > which require libp11-kit0 from unreleased for a functioning apt.
>
> I'm not sure I understand this way of addressing this issue.
>
>
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:39:48 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 8/17/20 10:33 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:24:59 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> On 7/4/20 1:32 PM, наб wrote:
> >>> This fixes, e.g., hurd installs from mini ISOs,
> >>> which
Hello!
On 7/4/20 1:32 PM, наб wrote:
> This fixes, e.g., hurd installs from mini ISOs,
> which require libp11-kit0 from unreleased for a functioning apt.
I'm not sure I understand this way of addressing this issue.
The proper way is obviously to fix the p11-kit package, not hack
Le vendredi 31 juillet à 13h 15mn 58s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > I wonder if the versioned
Hi,
Here is a patch proposal for this bug report. It aims :
- to be compatible with the install CD produced by debian-cd
- to avoid hard-coding a list of architectures in the Debian-Ports repository
- to make the use of the 'unreleased' distribution switchable.
I hope it will help to find a
наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on
> > > base-installer
> > > is necessary.
> >
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on
> > base-installer
> > is necessary.
> AIUI it is for getting the is_ports_architecture function from
>
Hello,
jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 12:44:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> Shipping all packages in the 'unstable' archive on the install CD
> is handy : this spares debootstrap the bother to merge the 'unstable'
> and 'unreleased' archives (with some pitfalls [1]).
Yes, I know, but it means that
jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on base-installer
> is necessary.
AIUI it is for getting the is_ports_architecture function from
/usr/lib/base-installer/library.sh?
> Bug #879130 was solved (thank you !),
Hi,
Thank you for your work to improve the installability of port architectures !
Sorry for jumping so late into the discussion of the patch of bug #964248.
I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on base-installer
is necessary. Bug #879130 was solved (thank you !), and
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 07:15:25PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I have pushed the change to the gits.
Thanks, Samuel!
I tried the mini ISO and it worked as expected,
downloading packages from unreleased w/o problems.
It did, however, encounter problems with trying to download
libhogweed and
Hello,
наб, le sam. 04 juil. 2020 13:32:35 +0200, a ecrit:
> I've posted these patches to debian-boot@ last month,
> but thought I'd try again.
Thanks for the ping. Since there was no concern raised in the meanwhile,
I have pushed the change to the gits.
Samuel
Package: base-installer
Severity: normal
Version: 1.194
Hi!
I've posted these patches to debian-boot@ last month,
but thought I'd try again.
Confer commit messages for detailed references, but the short of it is:
the base-installer patch pulls in ports arch detexion logic from
apt-setup and
13 matches
Mail list logo
