Bug#965839: Is tk5 still useful? (Re: Bug#965839: tk5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2020-10-01 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 06:52:39PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: tony mancill > > Since it looks fairly simple to update, I volunteer to update it to keep > > it around for at least one more cycle. It seems like a small investment > > to make, and maybe it helps a few users. > > Sure, if it

Bug#965839: Is tk5 still useful? (Re: Bug#965839: tk5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2020-09-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: tony mancill > Since it looks fairly simple to update, I volunteer to update it to keep > it around for at least one more cycle. It seems like a small investment > to make, and maybe it helps a few users. Sure, if it doesn't eat up an unproportional amount of time, that makes sense.

Bug#965839: Is tk5 still useful? (Re: Bug#965839: tk5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2020-09-30 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 08:00:27PM +0200, m...@debian.org wrote: > > The package tk5 uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6, > > which is deprecated and scheduled for removal[1]. > > tk5 was last touched by a maintainer for lenny, and then two NMUs. > > Is that software still useful?

Bug#965839: Is tk5 still useful? (Re: Bug#965839: tk5: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2020-08-02 Thread myon
> The package tk5 uses debhelper with a compat level of 5 or 6, > which is deprecated and scheduled for removal[1]. tk5 was last touched by a maintainer for lenny, and then two NMUs. Is that software still useful? Should we remove the package? The Icom R5 isn't sold anymore. Christoph